Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Thug Lyfe

Yesterday, for a debut anyway, I felt like I got a little heavy. “Hey check out my blog…I bet you would love a little American History coupled with some riots!” The thing about the situation is that the topics and points of view that I am sharing appear to be right in front of us all if we would just notice them once in a while. Let’s take a different route today and see if we can come up with something different.

From two different public officials (Mayor of Baltimore, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake and the President), the word “thug” was used to describe the rioters. Specifically, the President referred to them as thugs, as well as criminals. Let’s take a couple of things into consideration real fast. Firstly, both the Mayor of Baltimore and the President are African-American. Secondly, Freddie Gray, the victim of the police brutality, was also African-American. Finally, a very large majority of the rioters are African-American.

Now, stay with me here. I am actually going to get to a point soon.

Baltimore City Councilman Carl Stokes was recently interviewed on CNN about the situation, and was praising the efforts of citizens who were rising up against the random violence that has been occurring. Using powerful phrases like, “…this is Baltimore. This is our Baltimore. And they’re showing just who we are and why we’re standing up for justice, not only for Freddie Gray, but for all of the Freddie Grays that have been killed or brutalized in Baltimore.”

Pretty powerful stuff!

He was then asked to give his thoughts on the usage of the word ‘thug’ to describe the rioters. It should be noted, that the Councilman is African-American, as well. He spoke vehemently against the term, even going so far as comparing the word to the ‘n-word.’ He said on camera, “calling them thugs — just call them n*****s. Just call them n*****s. No, we don’t have to call them by names such as that. We don’t have to do that. That is exactly what we have set them to. Now, when you say ‘come on,’ come on what? You wouldn’t call your child a thug if they should do something that would not be what you would expect them to do.”

A couple of years ago, Seattle Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman also made comments like that when he was described as a thug for his post-game interview after the NFC Championship game. In response to the criticism he said, “It seems like [thug] is the accepted way of calling somebody the N word nowadays.”

So how about it loyal readers?

Unfortunately, most of these incidents concerning police violence are against people of color. I am not going to get into the issues of “unarmed, known criminal with priors, or completely innocent.” I am speaking specifically of the race relations. Either the news is merely just focusing on them to get ratings, or it is becoming a relevant issue to talk about.

Referring to angry youth, who happen to be African-American, as ‘thugs’ is being viewed as a substitution word.


It’s hard to say really. Throughout American history, the word thug has always be synonymous with criminal. Even more specifically, petty or common criminal. This being said, the word Thug has also been appropriated by hip-hop culture. This includes songs, groups, artists, albums, and even a lifestyle legitimized by Tupac Shakur.


2Pac had the words “Thug Life” tattooed across his stomach, and he used these words to say about it at the 1993 Indiana Black Expo:

When I say ‘Thug Life,’ I mean that s**t
Cause these white folks see us as thugs
I don’t care what y’all think
I don’t care if you think you a lawyer, if you a man, if you an ‘African-American’
If you whatever the f**k you think you are
We thugs and n****s to these m****f***rs…
And until we own some s**t, I’m gonna call it like it is
How are we going to be men if we’re starving?
If we walk by five different house, and be a man in any of those m****f***rs
How we gonna be a man?
How we gonna be African-Americans?
We black! We thugs! And We n*****s until we set this s**t right!
Trust me when I tell you that s**t!

Councilman Stokes and Richard Sherman seem to echo that sentiment. Using thug and the other word are almost interchangeable. Tupac almost seemed to embrace the idea until something would change in our culture/society. That was 1993. Look at 2015!

Progress.

Let me hear your comments.



Tuesday, April 28, 2015

A quick thank-you

I just want to go ahead and thanks my close friends and family who are being supportive in this venture.

Thanks
D

A Reflection



So this is it? This is the culmination of the Great Experiment known as The United States of America. Constant media coverage that shows an escalating police state, and unfocused violence not aimed at changing the system or situation, but instead viciously turning on the very citizens that are being victimized by the problem that is being protested against. Let me say that again. The violence that is being brought by the citizens is focused at harming the citizens themselves, not against those who are perpetrating the problem.

This makes no sense!

Now, there are many people out there that would say violence isn't the answer, and that there is a place for peaceful and civil discourse, and these people are correct. There actually is a time for that, but that time has passed. There have been no results with that option. John F. Kennedy was quoted saying, “Those who make peaceful protest revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.” Now that is a tough pill to swallow. I really think that, in many ways, for the last 20 or so years, the Unites States has fostered a sense civic accomplishment through vocal protest. It was this kind of revolution that brought on changes in civil rights, women’s rights, and even more recently, gay rights. This all being said, there seems to be a growing violence in our country that is on the verge of exploding.

This is in the very fabric of our country’s creation. In 1770, many Bostonians gathered around a hostile occupying force, because, quite frankly, they were sick of being told what to do and what to pay by a group of people who had no business dictating things like this in the first place. So what did they do? Well, even if you haven’t seen the HBO miniseries John Adams, I am sure you read or heard somewhere that these people turned violent. They started throwing snowballs, rocks, and bottles at the soldiers (law enforcement of the time) to demonstrate that the tipping point had come. The soldiers fired upon the crowd and killed 11 civilians. Because he was a believer in a sense of justice, John Adams was the only lawyer who was willing to ensure these soldiers received a fair trial, and the soldiers were acquitted. Sounds kind of like Rodney King, Trevon Martin, and Michael Brown, doesn't it?

Still though, the tipping point had come and the Founders took it to a new level – vandalism. Contrary to popular belief, it wasn't the tax on tea that made them dump it into the Bay. It was a demonstration against an overarching problem. You see, England had a monopoly on all trade coming in and out of Boston, especially tea. The Boston Tea Party was a violent act of vandalism in protest to all of it. Now, I’m not a historian, and I am sure that many a history buff or college professor would like to expand on the ins and outs of the American Revolution, but I’m here to say that the colonists were saying one thing: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! If it takes us destroying a luxury in our lives to send the message, so be it.

Now – before I go any further. Let’s do a compare and contrast. Yes, the Boston Tea Party was a violent act of vandalism in protest. Yes, it was against the luxuries that they held, but they did it to send a message. Afterwards, they did not go out and burn down Boston. They turned that violence against their aggressors. Quite frankly, maybe we should do the same.



"We surely cannot deny to any nation that right whereon our own government is founded, that every one may govern itself according to whatever form it pleases and change these forms at its own will... The will of the nation is the only thing essential to be regarded." --Thomas Jefferson to Gouverneur Morris, 1792. ME 9:36

"Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers (or presidents, governors, mayors, etc.), too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing [a people] to slavery." --Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America, 1774. (*) ME 1:193, Papers 1:125

"If ever there was a holy war, it was that which saved our liberties and gave us independence." --Thomas Jefferson to John Wayles Eppes, 1813. ME 13:430


"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson: his motto.